Tax payer kegger at Trip's?

LOL, check out this video from HillBuzz.org.

... So what happens when NSA listens to YOUR phone calls?

Read our lips: we do not want amnesty

That is the last line of a good article over at American Thinker today by Karin McQuillan.

Karin also says:

"President Bush let down his base by spending money like a drunken sailor. They stayed home.

Obama lost Democrat voters in 2012, but he won anyway because an estimated 6 million white voters stayed home compared to 2008. Who were these election drop-outs? Rural, working class Republicans. What issues did these voters care about? They are deficit hawks, and want to see government spending come under control - not a swelling of the welfare state to support illegals. They hate illegal immigration. They want good education and a solvent Medicare system. They want to feel listened to by their own party. And they will not vote for a party that betrays them, no matter how awful the other side is.

The Democrats want "comprehensive" immigration reform because it legalizes eleven (or is it twenty?) millionillegals, brings in their families and on top of that, doubles the number of legal immigrants. Plus the CBO says 75% of illegal immigration would continue. This will create a record number of foreign-born legals and illegals, mostly Spanish-speaking, mostly third world, mostly a net drain on taxpayers. We are talking about an estimated 56 million people within a decade. According to the Center for Immigration studies, "There has never been a period in American history when the foreign-born share grew this fast."

The immigration bill will permanently wipe away America as we know it. Democrats believe this will mean a permanent voting majority for their big government welfare state. They are right. We will become Republicans' worst nightmare: a nanny state with a permanent Democrat majority who feel entitled to live on taxpaying families.

Hopes for a good economic future for America's blacks and working class will be sunk, as they are forced to compete for low wage jobs. Hopes for constitutionally limited government will be sunk, as we get an unassimilated influx of third world people who do not understand our republic and the principals for which it stands." 

I have NOTHING against Mexicans or other Latin American people.  There is Spanish blood in my own family:  nieces and a nephew who are Irish-Peruvian.

I love Mexican food, Latin American people are hard working - and many are Catholic and family oriented.  I have NO problem with LEGAL immigrants from South America, Mexico or Spain (etc.)

I, and millions of other center-right Americans, only have a problem with ILLEGAL immigrants - and the OPEN BORDER policies/plans of the current Dino-Rino regimists.

Its NOT just Democrat-communists; it is traitorous Republicans also like Marco Rubio and the "gang of 8".

America MUST secure the borders FIRST and THEN fix up their immigration policies.  It is as SIMPLE as that - and it CAN be simple: check out Greta Van Susteren's 1 page plan here from Gretawire. (see?)

As Karin mentions in her article, from May 2013; Heritage advises what the The Fiscal Cost of Unlawful Immigrants and Amnesty to the U.S. Taxpayer will be:

"Executive Summary Unlawful immigration and amnesty for current unlawful immigrants can pose large fiscal costs for U.S. taxpayers. Government provides four types of benefits and services that are relevant to this issue:

• Direct benefits. These include Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation.
• Means-tested welfare benefits. There are over 80 of these programs which, at a cost of nearly $900 billion per year, provide cash, food, housing, medical, and other services to roughly 100 million low-income Americans. Major programs include Medicaid, food stamps, the refundable Earned Income Tax Credit, public housing, Supplemental Security Income, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
• Public education. At a cost of $12,300 per pupil per year, these services are largely free or heavily subsidized for low-income parents.
• Population-based services. Police, fire, highways, parks, and similar services, as the National Academy of Sciences determined in its study of the fiscal costs of immigration, generally have to expand as new immigrants enter a community; someone has to bear the cost of that expansion.

"The typical unlawful immigrant is 34 years old. After amnesty, this individual will receive government benefits, on average, for 50 years. Restricting access to benefits for the first 13 years after amnesty therefore has only a marginal impact on long-term costs.

If amnesty is enacted, the average adult unlawful immigrant would receive $592,000 more in government benefits over the course of his remaining lifetime than he would pay in taxes."

There is a lot more at Heritage, here's their conclusion:

"The United States offers enormous economic opportunities and societal benefits. Countless more people would immigrate to the U.S. if they had the opportunity. Given this context, the U.S. must be selective in its immigration policy. Policymakers must ensure that the interaction of welfare and other financial transfer programs with immigration does not expand the fiscally dependent population, thereby imposing large costs on American society.

Current immigration policies with respect to both lawful and unlawful immigration encourage the entry of a disproportionate number of poorly educated immigrants into the U.S. As these low-skill immigrants (both lawful and unlawful) take up residence, they impose a substantial tax burden on U.S. taxpayers. The benefits received by unlawful and low-skill immigrant households exceed taxes paid at each age level; at no point do these households pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits.

Current immigration practices, both lawful and unlawful, operate like a system of transnational welfare outreach, bringing millions of fiscally dependent individuals into the U.S. This policy needs to be changed. U.S. immigration policy should encourage high-skill immigration and strictly limit low-skill immigration. In general, government policy should limit immigration to those who will be net fiscal contributors, avoiding those who will increase poverty and impose new costs on overburdened U.S. taxpayers."

Um, hell-ooooo, Bueller?!?  America is already BROKE right now! 

What will happen to her if the House of Representatives does decide to hear and pass the horrible gang of 8" immigration bill?

The end of America is what happens.  That is path ol' Rubio and his buds have the USA on right now? Pure crap, it Grants Amnesty Without Closed Border!

O is awesome by Sunny

I've been travelin'....   we had a weekend away in Sydney, Australia. 

THAT was FUN!  I'll post some pics when I get a chance.  Haven't felt much like blogging.  Are you keeping up with continued leftist scandal-palooza-fest without me?

Good. 

Check out Zimmerman trial updates over at LegalInsurrection.com.  Good stuff. 

GREAT news from SCOTUS today with latest rulings.  Anything that pisses off Leftists, communists, race-baiter-types or O-administration is excellent in my book.

Need some humor?  From Sunny TV 2 months ago. Damn she is good... She convinces you how awesome O is!  ....... really!  snicker snicker



LOL... more Sunny over at House of Sunny

She ROCKS baby...

hey goofballs, wake up: capitalism doesn't "kill" people

Two books for the America haters like Haruhi Suzumiya who recently commented on a November 26, 2011 post of mine about communism:  Haruhi thinks more people die under capitalism.

WHAT?  Hey HARUHI and others who think capitalism is "bad".

WAKE UP! Go learn TRUTH and HISTORY. 

To understand American history, start with The 5000 Year Leap or The Making of America.

To understand economics - try a little Milton Friedman Capitalism and Freedom or Free to Choose which one reviewer says "Free to Choose" (1980) is a great companion to Friedman's ten hour video presentation by the same name that appeared on PBS in the early eighties to rave reviews and some of the highest ratings in PBS history. The video series was extremely well done and taken right from this book. Friedman explains how and why markets work, why minimum wage statutes hurt instead of help unskilled labor (they price entry level or "training positions" out of the market) and why the Great Depression happened (protectionist tariffs like Smoot-Hawley devastating trade between nations was the primary reason).

Like Hayek and von Mises before him, Friedman explodes the Keynesian mythology that government spending is actually good for the economy. Moreover, this book is written for the layman. You don't need a PhD in economics or a Nobel Prize (both of which Professor Friedman has) to understand this work. It is clear, concise and cogently written.

If you want to understand why the market is ineluctable, this is a must read...and if you get the chance, I highly recommend the companion video series - some of the best work done on explaining why the free market works and planned/controlled economies fail.

It as timely today (despite the dated references) because the free market still works (it always will) and command/controlled economies always fail...this book tells why."

Hope this post can be the start of clearing your brain of some of the cobwebs of Leftist college teaching.  You have been indoctrinated by Leftism - I can tell.  Try to SNAP out of it.

WAKEY WAKEYYYYYY...   From The Making of America: 

Islam threatens YOU personally

Do you fully Understand the threat that is Islam?

"Most Americans would agree that terrorism is a threat, but few understand violent jihad in its proper context. Terrorism is one of the primary ways that Western nations are softened to Islamists' stealthier tactics which involve gradual infiltration and subversion of a society's foundational religiopolitical, military, legal, educational, and media institutions.

The Muslim Brotherhood refer to their strategy in America as a "Civilization-Jihadist Process,” and their work in the US as “a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their [westerners'] hands and the hands of the believers [true followers of Allah] so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Unbeknownst to many Americans, the "Civilization-Jihad" in the US began in 1963 with the establishment of the first Muslim Brotherhood front group in North America, the Muslim Students Association (MSA). Fifty years later, there are hundreds of MSA chapters on US college campuses, multiplied numbers of prominent Muslim Brotherhood front groups, and a large yet undetermined number of individuals affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah and other US-designated terrorist groups working in national, state, and local government, many at the highest levels.

The freedoms Americans have taken for granted since our nation’s Founding are being systematically undermined from within by an enemy that has penetrated every sector of the Federal bureaucracy, including our national security, intelligence, military, law enforcement, and diplomatic agencies and the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of our Government. The clandestine jihad has made enormous strides in America since 9/11, due in large part to the willful blindness of national leaders who have focused all of their energies on terrorism prevention and winning the kinetic war while ignoring the more insidious, growing threat."

Highlighted at Victoria Jackson's site, interesting video which explains some stuff. 



Oh and related - here's a more light hearted video explaining a bit about the current O-regime SPY PROGRAM, its invasion of privacy and why YOU should care about it:

FIGHT to KEEP free speech in USA alive and well

Freedom of speech is the FIRST AMENDMENT of the USA constitution! 
It is the bedrock of the United States Constitutional Republic!
Free speech isn't 'free' unless free people FIGHT to retain and keep it!

Pam G's has a fiery speech about this topic recently in Tennessee:




So why exactly is Pamela G. all fired up in Tennessee?  Details from Cliff Kincaid over at Trevor Loudon who writes:  "An Islamic Center in Chattanooga, Tennessee features “Strong Islamic studies,” a term that implies Sharia, or Islamic law."

A TENNESSE MOSQUE is advocating for Sharia law WITHIN THE USA. Islamic supporters want to make CRITICIZING Islam illegal.  This mean: THEY WANT TO BAN FREE SPEECH!

Mr Kincaid continues "Lafferty said it was entirely predictable that when Killian mentioned the name of the Attorney General, Eric Holder, who is neck-deep in several scandals, people in the audience booed. “Every mention of Holder had the same effect,” he noted.

Killian’s speech, Lafferty said, was that “Muslims are misunderstood and they are no different than you or me” and any criticism of Islam is “hate-mongering and bigotry.”

“The biggest story of the event was the crowd,” Lafferty said. While some people were angry and animated in their reactions to Killian’s lecture on “hate crimes,” he said there was intimate knowledge of Islamic practices and that when Muslim speakers at the podium with Killian talked about Islam as a peaceful religion which valued good citizenship, people interrupted with the word “takiya,” a reference to the Islamic concept of deception.

However, CAIR and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) insisted that local residents, as well as Geller and Spencer, were at fault for reacting to the DOJ campaign against the First Amendment. This became the story line of much of the coverage of the event.

The SPLC works hand-in-glove with the Obama/Holder Justice Department, smearing opponents of radical Islam as “Islamophobes.”

But Lafferty of VAST said the focus was “that a special meeting was being conducted to talk about the Department of Justice’s commitment to protect the rights of one religious group—Islam.”

Lafferty and others question why the Justice Department has singled out Muslims for special protection and that such a practice reflects adherence to Sharia, or Islamic law, over and above American law and the Constitution.

He noted that the DOJ based this meeting on the fact that a local Tennessee politician had posted a stupid gag on Facebook about targeting Muslims, and that the incident was “being used as the pushing off point for Justice to scrutinize every statement about Islam on the Internet.”

“Both Pamela Geller and the incomparable Robert Spencer spoke brilliantly about free speech and the threat posed to it by government suppression,” Lafferty said."

"I don't care if you want to worship a stone, just don't stone me with it!..." P. Geller

Leno points out the O-bsurdity

ha ha ha... funny stuff from Leno posted at Gateway Pundit: