Did Glenn Beck miss everything going on in 2009?
OR, at CPAC, was Beck just talking about RINO John McCain? (Yes, I still support Sarah Palin who has to support McCain - he did give us the gift which is Ms. Palin so he's not 100% horrible.)
However, Michelle Malkin reminds us, and the GOP, McCain IS one of the main problems:
"... to this day, McCain refuses to admit his own individual responsibility for supporting the pre-socialization of the economy started under George W. Bush and continued under Obama. And fellow Republicans continue to whitewash McCain’s fiscal irresponsibility record.
McCain has never admitted he was wrong about his support of:
*The $700 billion all-purpose, earmark-stuffed TARP bailout;
*The $25 billion auto bailout;
*The $300 billion mortgage entitlement bailout; and
*The first $85 billion AIG bailout.
His latest McLame-est excuse for supporting TARP? He was “misled.” "
So... for you 100% Beck fans: why is Beck above criticism?
I (and lots of others) still want to know why he refuses to discuss ALL constitutional issues including the Natural Born Citizen requirement for POTUS.
No answer for that yet, he jumped on the 'mock everything birther' bandwagon awhile ago....
Also, have you noticed how Beck and O'Reilly are best buds lately - even going on a recent comedy/speaking tour? That was odd. O'Reilly firmly disses 'birthers', too. So, are they in cahoots and if so, why? ... this paragraph sounds a bit paranoid on my part: but guess what I still want to know: why "it" (NBC) won't be discussed fully on FOX? I will always want this resolved - until it is resolved!
I noted recent "put up or shut up" Beck complaints on 3-Feb-10: CitizenWells has now put Beck and O'Reilly on his "US Constitution Hall of Shame".
Beck was the keynote / last speaker at recent CPAC convention. As GatewayPundit noted, Bill Bennett at National Review commented on the oddities in his CPAC speech: Beck thinks Republicans and Democrats are the same? (what? where has he been all year?):
"To say the GOP and the Democrats are no different, to say the GOP needs to hit a recovery-program-type bottom and hang its head in remorse, is to delay our own country’s recovery from the problems the Democratic left is inflicting. The stakes are too important to go through that kind of exercise, which will ultimately go nowhere anyway — because it’s already happened.
The first task of a serious political analyst is to see things as they are. There is a difference between morning and night. There is a difference between drunk and sober. And there is a difference between the Republican and Democratic parties. To ignore these differences, or propagate the myth that they don’t exist, is not only discouraging, it is dangerous."
C. Edmund Wright at AmericanThinker noticed Glenn's odd CPAC speech comments as well:
"Beck is a passionate and talented communicator, and he really explains "the idea of America" and how it coincides with modern Reagan conservatism very well. I just wish he could bring himself to admit that there are folks in the Republican Party who agree with that -- and there always have been.
Moreover, we need that very party to stop the Obama-Reid-Pelosi leftist express regardless of how flawed they are.
One has to question what could possibly be motivating Beck to be so blind to this. It has to be willful. He is a student of history! Could there be something ulterior at work?
In his speech, Beck claimed Rush and Reagan as his heroes. As a point of fact, both have given the CPAC keynote address -- Reagan numerous times. A study of the two indicates that neither would approve of much of Beck's speech, ironically. Of course, neither would have pulled the straw for Ron Paul either.
So without a doubt, it was a very strange ending to what had been an incredible weekend at CPAC. And Mr. Beck: If I am wrong in my analysis -- call me!"
Beck was the keynote / last speaker at recent CPAC convention. As GatewayPundit noted, Bill Bennett at National Review commented on the oddities in his CPAC speech: Beck thinks Republicans and Democrats are the same? (what? where has he been all year?):
"To say the GOP and the Democrats are no different, to say the GOP needs to hit a recovery-program-type bottom and hang its head in remorse, is to delay our own country’s recovery from the problems the Democratic left is inflicting. The stakes are too important to go through that kind of exercise, which will ultimately go nowhere anyway — because it’s already happened.
The first task of a serious political analyst is to see things as they are. There is a difference between morning and night. There is a difference between drunk and sober. And there is a difference between the Republican and Democratic parties. To ignore these differences, or propagate the myth that they don’t exist, is not only discouraging, it is dangerous."
C. Edmund Wright at AmericanThinker noticed Glenn's odd CPAC speech comments as well:
"Beck is a passionate and talented communicator, and he really explains "the idea of America" and how it coincides with modern Reagan conservatism very well. I just wish he could bring himself to admit that there are folks in the Republican Party who agree with that -- and there always have been.
Moreover, we need that very party to stop the Obama-Reid-Pelosi leftist express regardless of how flawed they are.
One has to question what could possibly be motivating Beck to be so blind to this. It has to be willful. He is a student of history! Could there be something ulterior at work?
In his speech, Beck claimed Rush and Reagan as his heroes. As a point of fact, both have given the CPAC keynote address -- Reagan numerous times. A study of the two indicates that neither would approve of much of Beck's speech, ironically. Of course, neither would have pulled the straw for Ron Paul either.
So without a doubt, it was a very strange ending to what had been an incredible weekend at CPAC. And Mr. Beck: If I am wrong in my analysis -- call me!"
No comments:
Post a Comment