tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663963575919337639.post5455125459842470907..comments2023-08-24T23:39:33.470+12:00Comments on Saucy American in NZ: Nutty "search for 9/11 truth" does not = "NBC" enforcementLisa G in NZhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02726078658954265756noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663963575919337639.post-54262310123116131692010-03-08T17:27:05.228+13:002010-03-08T17:27:05.228+13:00Thanks for taking time to give me your thoughtful ...Thanks for taking time to give me your thoughtful comments, Dr. Kate. <br /><br />I will keep an harsh eye on d2i, though, because d2i (and others) STILL push the 9/11 "stuff" on CWells. <br /><br />Simply: after a year of research, I have troll radar & listen to my spidey sense. <br /><br />I think 9/11 "questions remain" is a big disinformation campaign so I probably agree with you a lot more than you may think. <br /><br />I suppose since you discussed it and I respect your opinion, it is almost like you gave the 9/11 conspiracy worthiness... if that makes sense? It really made me cringe. <br /><br />That is why I provided you that link to the "Screw 9/11 mysteries" which I found worthwhile. <br /><br />Progrs, dems & obots are out in force everywhere. The war is ON and they attack with lies a lot. <br /><br />I am tired of koolaid drinking peeps over at Infowars and frankly I'm tired of the disinformation campaign. <br /><br />However, I will continue to fight and 'question with boldness' even to question the questioners (eg why won't Beck discuss eligibility?)<br /><br />I think the 'typical' libertarian stance of both DNC and RNC being equally wrong is incorrect. <br /><br />I say pick sides and keep your powder dry.Lisa G in NZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02726078658954265756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663963575919337639.post-55145300198362660092010-03-08T16:38:29.937+13:002010-03-08T16:38:29.937+13:00Liz, I completely disagree with your analysis of m...Liz, I completely disagree with your analysis of me, my article, d21, and my website. And I hope you publish this comment. I am taking the time to write this because I like you and have always appreciated your comments on my blog, even those that are critical.<br /><br />Let me please set the record straight.<br /><br />1. In my article which you do not like, I equated the silence on NBC with the silence on 911, noting that the democrats dropped investigations into numerous things (not just 911) which I thought paved the way for Obama to get in despite his ineligibility.<br /><br />2. I noted to my readers that I was uncomfortable with this analysis, but had to ask the question anyway.<br /><br />3. I NEVER thought at all that our government could be complicit in 911; I am still not convinced that it was; I detested Berg's case on 911; BUT, someone knows something, and there are too many financial issues surrounding 911 to ignore the complicity of someone.<br /><br />4. I happened upon all the videos in my post accidentally, I was not looking for them. Th A&E report is the most extensive I found, and the most convincing, even after having looked at the ones you provided to me. The "911 missing links" movie was useful to me, raised questions, but I don't "believe" everything.<br /><br />5. I finished by suggesting that Obama and the democrats have something on the Republicans, and vice-versa, so that NO ONE is questioning his eligibility.<br /><br />6. I did a follow up post the next day which I laid out my plans for moving forward, none of which involved investigating 911.<br /><br />I write my own things and take responsibility for them. I started by blog because I was sick of the obots, and have over 1,500 blocked obot IPs in my 'discussion' section of the blog. I have been attacked by 3,000 or so bot posts.<br /><br />d2i is NOT a BOT, and is certainly not deserving of your invective.<br /><br />Thank you, and I do hope I haven't lost you as a poster on my site. Blessings, Liz.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663963575919337639.post-6916813485072035342010-03-06T19:53:51.787+13:002010-03-06T19:53:51.787+13:00I agree re: Beck tjones, thanksI agree re: Beck tjones, thanksLisa G in NZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02726078658954265756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663963575919337639.post-51113036253503401492010-03-06T19:11:44.717+13:002010-03-06T19:11:44.717+13:00You are definitely correct about the "Obots&q...You are definitely correct about the "Obots",etc.,as well as Beck's blindspot re:birth certificate,blahblah.Even as I cheer on most of his work,I think he gets too hung up on certain things,,and gets lost in the "progressive" smear.tjoneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13338658007048283503noreply@blogger.com